<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Battlestar Galactica&#8217; Won&#8217;t be Bryan Singer&#8217;s Next Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifiscoop.com/tv-shows/battlestar-galactica/battlestar-galactica-wont-be-bryan-singers-next-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifiscoop.com/tv-shows/battlestar-galactica/battlestar-galactica-wont-be-bryan-singers-next-film/</link>
	<description>Sci Fi News - On Sci Fi Scoop you&#039;ll find all the latest sci fi news together with sci fi collectibles and movie trailers for the latest sci fi films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:04:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiscoop.com/tv-shows/battlestar-galactica/battlestar-galactica-wont-be-bryan-singers-next-film/comment-page-1/#comment-5415</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiscoop.com/?p=15650#comment-5415</guid>
		<description>Just to point out, my comment about &quot;remakes&quot; was meant to be more general than Battlestar specific, made in a month where I had to write many articles about old movies being remade. The comment stems not from a whining about Battlestar as much as it does from my being sick of hearing more about remakes than new original films. 

Whilst many great and original ideas gather dust, remakes of stories already told are getting millions thrown at them which is very frustrating, especially for creative writers who struggle to have their original work considered because of the financial risk evaluation machine. 

For the record, I loved the original Battlestar and I loved Moore&#039;s Battlestar.  I am, however, not a &quot;fanboy&quot; of anything to the exclusion of anything else. I will most definitely head to the theater to see Singer&#039;s Battlestar BUT I would prefer to head to the theater to see an original sci-fi film than the third version of a good story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out, my comment about &#8220;remakes&#8221; was meant to be more general than Battlestar specific, made in a month where I had to write many articles about old movies being remade. The comment stems not from a whining about Battlestar as much as it does from my being sick of hearing more about remakes than new original films. </p>
<p>Whilst many great and original ideas gather dust, remakes of stories already told are getting millions thrown at them which is very frustrating, especially for creative writers who struggle to have their original work considered because of the financial risk evaluation machine. </p>
<p>For the record, I loved the original Battlestar and I loved Moore&#8217;s Battlestar.  I am, however, not a &#8220;fanboy&#8221; of anything to the exclusion of anything else. I will most definitely head to the theater to see Singer&#8217;s Battlestar BUT I would prefer to head to the theater to see an original sci-fi film than the third version of a good story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiscoop.com/tv-shows/battlestar-galactica/battlestar-galactica-wont-be-bryan-singers-next-film/comment-page-1/#comment-5414</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiscoop.com/?p=15650#comment-5414</guid>
		<description>There are sooooo many remakes nowadays that &quot;remake&quot; is a dirty word. Plenty of Larson fans applied it to Moore&#039;s BSG.  Plenty of Moore fans will apply it to Singer&#039;s BSG. My view?  It&#039;s not a dirty word, it&#039;s a FILTHY word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are sooooo many remakes nowadays that &#8220;remake&#8221; is a dirty word. Plenty of Larson fans applied it to Moore&#8217;s BSG.  Plenty of Moore fans will apply it to Singer&#8217;s BSG. My view?  It&#8217;s not a dirty word, it&#8217;s a FILTHY word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callahan</title>
		<link>http://www.scifiscoop.com/tv-shows/battlestar-galactica/battlestar-galactica-wont-be-bryan-singers-next-film/comment-page-1/#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifiscoop.com/?p=15650#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>Bearing in mind that getting a script completed, pre-production Art Design, Costume Design, Set Design and Construction, casting, etc, etc, etc. It&#039;s no surprise that an A-List Director like Singer would have other projects in the pipeline, along with the TOS Universe based Battlestar Galactica Feature.

Even in a best case scenerio, cameras wouldn&#039;t be expected to start rolling til a year from now, at the very earliest, as this will most likely not be a quick and dirty, every colony looks like Vancouver, or all the Costumes look like JC Pennys off the rack approach to BSG. Plenty of time for Singer to complete his work on Jack the Giant Killer. After the initial pre-production groundwork has been completed for Battlestar Galactica, Singer would be ready to Direct. There really is no need to a Director to have to micromanage the Pre-Production process

Jack the Giant Killer has had a script for some time, written by Mark Bomback. Much of the early groundwork was begun months and months ago, under the previous Director D.J. Caruso. Presumably Neal Moritz is still Producing, so this would not be Singer having to start from scratch.

As for the last comment, &quot;because “prequel” isn’t quite as dirty a word as “remake”.&quot; Strange, I don&#039;t remember that being applied to Moore&#039;s Galactica, I must have missed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bearing in mind that getting a script completed, pre-production Art Design, Costume Design, Set Design and Construction, casting, etc, etc, etc. It&#8217;s no surprise that an A-List Director like Singer would have other projects in the pipeline, along with the TOS Universe based Battlestar Galactica Feature.</p>
<p>Even in a best case scenerio, cameras wouldn&#8217;t be expected to start rolling til a year from now, at the very earliest, as this will most likely not be a quick and dirty, every colony looks like Vancouver, or all the Costumes look like JC Pennys off the rack approach to BSG. Plenty of time for Singer to complete his work on Jack the Giant Killer. After the initial pre-production groundwork has been completed for Battlestar Galactica, Singer would be ready to Direct. There really is no need to a Director to have to micromanage the Pre-Production process</p>
<p>Jack the Giant Killer has had a script for some time, written by Mark Bomback. Much of the early groundwork was begun months and months ago, under the previous Director D.J. Caruso. Presumably Neal Moritz is still Producing, so this would not be Singer having to start from scratch.</p>
<p>As for the last comment, &#8220;because “prequel” isn’t quite as dirty a word as “remake”.&#8221; Strange, I don&#8217;t remember that being applied to Moore&#8217;s Galactica, I must have missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

